Peer Review Process

The journal utilizes a double review process:

• All manuscripts will initially be pre-reviewed by the editors for the requirements and suitability for the journal, before being sent to a minimum of two independent peer reviewers.
• Comments and recommendations from the reviewers help the editor to decide whether or not to publish the articles in our journal.
• The editor will have the final decision about whether to accept or reject the article. The editor may request the author to revise the article before making the final decision.

Peer-Review Time (around 10 weeks)

• Initial Submission (1 week): Editorial team checks for topic relevance, originality, formatting, and ethical compliance.

• Reviewer Assignment (1 week): Suitable reviewers (typically 2-3 experts) are selected and invited to review the manuscript.

• Peer Review Evaluation (4 weeks): Reviewers assess manuscript content, methodology, scientific contribution, and clarity, providing detailed feedback.

• Editorial Decision & Feedback (1 week): Editorial board evaluates reviewers' comments, makes decisions (accept, minor revision, major revision, reject), and communicates clearly to the authors.

• Manuscript Revision by Authors (2 weeks): Authors revise the manuscript according to provided feedback and resubmit the revised version.

• Final Editorial Decision (1 week): Editors review revised manuscript and make the final publication decision.